A Monte Carlo Simulation of Photon Beam Generated by a Linear Accelerator
Authors
Abstract:
ntroduction: Monte Carlo simulation is the most accurate method of simulating radiation transport and predicting doses at different points of interest in radiotherapy. A great advantage of the Monte Carlo method compared to the deterministic methods is the ability to deal accurately with any complex geometry. Its disadvantage is the extremely long computing time required to obtain a dose distribution with good statistical accuracy. Materials and Methods: The MCNP-4C Monte Carlo code was used to simulate a 9 MV photon beam from a Neptun 10PC linear accelerator. The accelerator was modeled as a complete unit consisting of a target, exit window, initial collimator, primary collimator, flattening filter, monitor chamber and secondary collimator. The geometrical details and the composition of each component was either obtained from the manufacturer or was directly measured. The simulation of the source was performed in a two step process. Initially, the electron source was defined. Secondly, the bremsstrahlung energy spectra and the fluence distribution at the scoring planes were used to define the photon source. The simulated electron beam energy followed a Gaussian distribution, with FWHM equal to 12% in nominal energy. The used intensity distribution of the electron beam also followed a Gaussian distribution with a FWHM equal to 0.34 cm. To compute the photon beam data a 50 × 50 × 40 cm 3 water phantom located at SSD = 100 cm was simulated. The depth dose and the dose profile curves were calculated for four different field sizes (5×5, 10×10, 20×20 and 30×30 cm 2 ) and compared against the measured values. The low-energy cut-off for the photons and electrons was 10 and 500 KeV, respectively. The measurements were carried out by using a Scanditronix dose scanning system and a 0.12 cm 3 RK ionization chamber. Results: To verify the simulated model, the calculated Monte Carlo dose data were compared against the corresponding measured values. The energy spectra and the angular distribution of the x-ray beam generated by the Neptun 10PC linac was examined. The result showed an efficiency of about 73% for the production of bermsstrahlung photon by the target. The agreement between the calculated and the measured depth dose and the dose profile was generally better than 2% for all the fields. Discussion and Conclusion: The simulation of the Neptun 10PC linac performed in this work is capable of computing the depth dose data and the beam profiles in water phantom for all the predefined fields including 5×5, 10×10, 20×20 and 30×30 cm 2 . Therefore, it can be concluded that MCNP-4C is a suitable tool for the dose calculation in radiotherapy. The simulated linac machine and the resulting data can be used to predict the dose distribution in all complex fields.
similar resources
a monte carlo simulation of photon beam generated by a linear accelerator
ntroduction: monte carlo simulation is the most accurate method of simulating radiation transport and predicting doses at different points of interest in radiotherapy. a great advantage of the monte carlo method compared to the deterministic methods is the ability to deal accurately with any complex geometry. its disadvantage is the extremely long computing time r...
full textMonte Carlo Simulation of a Linear Accelerator and Electron Beam Parameters Used in Radiotherapy
Introduction: In recent decades, several Monte Carlo codes have been introduced for research and medical applications. These methods provide both accurate and detailed calculation of particle transport from linear accelerators. The main drawback of Monte Carlo techniques is the extremely long computing time that is required in order to obtain a dose distribution with good statistical accuracy. ...
full textmonte carlo simulation of a linear accelerator and electron beam parameters used in radiotherapy
introduction: in recent decades, several monte carlo codes have been introduced for research and medical applications. these methods provide both accurate and detailed calculation of particle transport from linear accelerators. the main drawback of monte carlo techniques is the extremely long computing time that is required in order to obtain a dose distribution with good statistical accuracy. ...
full textBenchmarking of Monte Carlo model of 6 Mv photon beam produced by Siemens Oncor® linear accelerator: determination of initial electron beam parameters in comparison with measurement
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the initial electron beam parameters for Monte Carlo model of 6MV photon beam produced by Siemens Oncor® linear accelerator. Materials and Methods: In this study, the EGSnrc Monte Carlo user codes BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc were used. The beamnrc code were used for modelling of a 6 MV photon beam produced by...
full textLocalization of electron virtual SSD in a Siemens-Primus linear accelerator: Comparison of measurements with Monte Carlo simulation
Introduction: Because of importance of impact of the Source to Surface Distance (SSD) in determining of monitor unit for electron-therapy, it is essential to know the Virtual Source Position (VSP) for electron beam for a linear therapeutic accelerator for each energy and field size. , especially using the Khan method (photo distance squared method) And compare the results with...
full textMonte carlo simulation of varian clinac iX 10 MV photon beam for small field dosimetry
Background: The lack of lateral electronic disequilibrium (LED) becomes a main problem in small field. This factor affects the dose in target volume cannot predict correctly. In addition, utilization of high-energy linear accelerator (10 MV) can emit some unwanted particles (electron contamination). Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize head linear accelerator (linac) Varian Clin...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 2 issue 2
pages 3- 12
publication date 2005-06-01
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023